Analysis of the 2000 presidential election george w bush vs al gore

It looked big, gracious. VolusiaPalm BeachBroward and Miami-Dadewhich are counties that traditionally vote Democratic and would be expected to garner more votes for Gore. This region of the state traditionally voted mostly Republican.

United States presidential election, 2000

The manual recounts were time-consuming, and it soon became clear that some counties would not complete their recounts before the deadline.

Ultimately, the contest focused on Florida. Former cabinet member George Shultz played an important early role in securing establishment Republican support for Bush.

The graph to the left showing an abnormally high Buchanan vote in Palm Beach County suggests the butterfly ballot cost Al Gore thousands of votes, more than enough to have won the presidency.

By late November the Florida state canvassing board certified Bush the winner by votes, but the election still was unresolved, as legal battles remained. Gore did remand the case instead of dismissing it, but the remand did not include another request for clarification. If one percent of these Democrats had stuck with their own candidate, Al Gore would easily have won Florida and become president.

Two of these, Breyer and Souter, acknowledged that the counting up until December 9 had not conformed with Equal Protection requirements. The four counties granted the request and began manual recounts. The critical remedial issue[ edit ] The most closely decided aspect of the case was the key question of what remedy the Court should order, in view of an Equal Protection Clause violation.

Later in the evening, the networks reversed their call, moving to "too close to call", then later giving it to Bush; then they retracted that call as well, finally indicating the state was "too close to call".

See Article History Bush v. Dissenting justices wrote that the recount process, while flawed, should be allowed to proceed, on the grounds that constitutional protection of each vote should not be subject to a timeline. Since this "new law" had not been directed by the Florida legislature, it violated Article II.

Bush ultimately prevailed after a strenuous fight, including an especially brutal effort by the Bush campaign in the South Carolina primary. Florida Attorney General Bob Butterworth, a Gore supporter, later told the counties to reconsider those ballots without a postmark.

He said he got more media coverage after the election than he did during the campaign id. The instructions on the sample ballots said "Vote every page. The United States Supreme Court, however, stopped the manual recount altogether by requiring canvassing boards to meet an impossible Electoral College deadline.

Louise Weinberg argues that, even giving the Court the benefit of the doubt that it acted appropriately in intervening in Florida state law, its actions should be deemed unconstitutional because its intervention was not coupled with any kind of remedy aimed at determining the actual outcome of the election.

The record, as weighed by the Florida Supreme Court, suggested that different standards were seemingly applied to the recount from ballot to ballot, precinct to precinct, and county to county, even when identical types of ballots and machines were used.

Democrats claimed that many simply had names similar to actual felons, some listed "felonies" were dated years in the future, and some were random. The presidential race included two major party candidates—Republican George W.

2000 United States presidential election recount in Florida

Bush and Democrat Al Gore—and two prominent third party candidates— Ralph Nader of the Green Party and Pat Buchanan of the Reform Party. Bush v. Gore, U.S. 98 (), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's presidential election.

The ruling was issued on December 12, On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was holidaysanantonio.com case name: George W. Bush and Richard Cheney, Petitioners v. Albert Gore, Jr. and Joseph Lieberman, et al. Bush v.

Gore, U.S. 98 (), was a decision of the United States Supreme Court that settled a recount dispute in Florida's presidential holidaysanantonio.com ruling was issued on December 12, On December 9, the Court had preliminarily halted the Florida recount that was occurring.

Eight days earlier, the Court unanimously decided the closely related case of Bush holidaysanantonio.comrence: Rehnquist, joined by Scalia, Thomas. Despite continued economic growth, the presidential election between Vice Pres. Al Gore and Texas Gov. George W.

Bush v. Gore

Bush, the former president’s eldest son, was one of the closest and most controversial in the republic’s history. Following the U.S.

2000 United States presidential election recount in Florida

Supreme Court's decision in Bush holidaysanantonio.com Beach County Canvassing Board, and concurrent with Vice President Al Gore's contest of the certification of Florida presidential election results, on December 8, the Florida Supreme Court ordered that the Circuit Court in Leon County tabulate by hand contested ballots from Miami-Dade County.

Dec 19,  · Bush and Gore, of course, were the two candidates: George W. Bush, the governor of Texas and son of the forty-first president, challenging the incumbent vice president, Al Gore. Bush v.

Analysis of the 2000 presidential election george w bush vs al gore
Rated 3/5 based on 73 review
United States presidential election of | United States government | holidaysanantonio.com