If a political leader has a strong military, there will be no need to concern oneself with laws. He does so in hope of pleasing and enlightening the Medici family. A prince, therefore, should only keep his word when it suits his purposes, but do his utmost to maintain the illusion that he does keep his word and that he is reliable in that regard.
Machiavelli goes on to say that a prince who obtains power through the support of the nobles has a harder time staying in power than someone who is chosen by the common people; since the former finds himself surrounded by people who consider themselves his equals.
He also warns against idleness. However, one can be generous with the things one takes from others. On the other hand: He thinks Machiavelli may have been influenced by Tacitus as well as his own experience, but finds no clear predecessor for this.
Machiavelli gives a negative example in Emperor Maximilian I ; Maximilian, who was secretive, never consulted others, but once he ordered his plans and met dissent, he immediately changed them. Concerning the behavior of a prince toward his subjects, Machiavelli announces that he will depart from what other writers say, and writes: The way in which the word state came to acquire this modern type of meaning during the Renaissance has been the subject of many academic discussions, with this sentence and similar ones in the works of Machiavelli being considered particularly important.
I can well believe it; for it is that Court it most clearly portrays. The book had originally been intended for Giuliano di Lorenzo de' Mediciyoung Lorenzo's uncle, who however died in But it is unusual that the Medici family's position of Papal power is openly named as something that should be used as a personal power base, as a tool of secular politics.
For a prince who leads his own army, it is imperative for him to observe cruelty because that is the only way he can command his soldiers' absolute respect.
A prudent prince should have a select group of wise counselors to advise him truthfully on matters all the time. Fortune, Machiavelli argues, seems to strike at the places where no resistance is offered, as had recently been the case in Italy. According to Machiavelli, these are relatively easy to maintain, once founded.
Although many critics consider The Prince a satire, simply an attempt to reveal the problems with the ruling class, most see Machiavelli's work as a serious attempt to lay the groundwork for the reunification of Italy under the Medici family of Florence.
Machiavelli has a very low opinion of the people throughout history. He cites the Romans as best exemplifying this strategy of conquest. He cites Cyrus, Julius Caesar, and Alexander the Great as military leaders who rewarded citizens with possessions taken from others.
Through war a hereditary prince maintains his power or a private citizen rises to power. If he cannot raise a formidable army, but must rely on defense, he must fortify his city.
Machiavelli's ideas on how to accrue honour and power as a leader had a profound impact on political leaders throughout the modern west, helped by the new technology of the printing press.
Contradicting conventional morality, Machiavelli advises wise princes to use violence and cunning to safeguard their states. He has to resort to malevolent measures to satisfy the nobles. Using the arms of another political leader can also be harmful.
This is one of Machiavelli's most lasting influences upon modernity. In some cases the old king of the conquered kingdom depended on his lords.
Machiavelli advises that a prince must frequently hunt in order to keep his body fit and learn the landscape surrounding his kingdom. Machiavelli makes the distinction between the different types of arms or military forces available to a leader.
Using fortresses can be a good plan, but Machiavelli says he shall "blame anyone who, trusting in fortresses, thinks little of being hated by the people".
For intellectual strength, he is advised to study great military men so he may imitate their successes and avoid their mistakes. Machiavelli makes the distinction between the different types of arms or military forces available to a leader.
Fortune, Machiavelli argues, seems to strike at the places where no resistance is offered, as had recently been the case in Italy. If he cannot raise a formidable army, but must rely on defense, he must fortify his city.
Avoiding contempt and hatred Chapter 19 [ edit ] Machiavelli observes that most men are content as long as they are not deprived of their property and women.
Machiavelli makes the distinction between the different types of arms (or military forces) available to a leader. Some arms are the prince’s own, some are mercenary, and some belong to others. Machiavelli’s The Prince: Themes & Major themes in the book.
The Prince, written by Niccolo Machiavelli, is one of the first examinations of politics and science from. The Prince: Theme Analysis, Free Study Guides and book notes including comprehensive chapter analysis, complete summary analysis, author biography information, character profiles, theme analysis, metaphor analysis, and top ten quotes on classic literature.
In The Prince Niccolò Machiavelli shrewdly outlines the strategies that a ruler must follow to maintain his position and govern his state. With a clear and direct authorial voice, Machiavelli employs ancient and contemporary examples to illustrate the pragmatic tactics of successful leaders.
Machiavelli focuses on evil features more because they would help to advance the power of the prince. In his book, it does not seem that an evil or cruel behavior is an unacceptable one, as he alters the moral vocabulary about vice and good.
The Prince is an extended analysis of how to acquire and maintain political power. It includes 26 chapters and an opening dedication to Lorenzo de Medici. The dedication declares Machiavelli's intention to discuss in plain language the conduct of great men and the principles of princely government.Machievellis the prince analysis